>Phil, can you stop please? You've posted about a dozen times about your >opinion on the "naff" alarm window. I get it. You have a bug open, it >will eventually be addressed. > >I believe in the open forum concept, but if I'm reading the same thing >repeatedly from you it turns into noise. > Okay, I'm sorry. I'm quite passionate, but don't mean to be rude. I won't call it naff anymore (although I think I've only lost my rag and actually called it naff twice!).
On the other hand - hey, not fair! Different threads, different forums, different people. And I've only been responding to different threads where people are repeatedly saying the opposite. It's only fair. This is the first official response to any of those posts, and it's nice to hear that eventually something will be done. I've been around here long enough to understand that if you don't drum up enough support in the forums to vote for bugs/enhancements, then nothing happens. I think if nothing else, there's been enough responses to various threads *by everyone* (not just me) that shows that there is no right answer. At least I know now that my messages finally seem to be getting through the email gateway reliably! Once again, sorry. I realise you've been doing some good work on reliability of alarms, didn't mean to touch a nerve on the UI side of things. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
