JJZolx wrote: > The obvious short-term fix is to just use your sorty genre names, which > will sort correctly and still be readable, and skip the post-scan fixup. > It's not like genres are prominently displayed throughout any of the > Squeezebox user interfaces, so the appearance of the names shouldn't be > that big of a concern. > > But I would also register a bug report and an enhancement request: > > 1. Use genre.namesort to sort genres. I'd say the current behavior is a > bug. > > 2. Add support for a GENRESORT field. Then you can attack the problem > purely in your tagging, with no need for either the post-scan gyrations > or modification of the code. SC, SBS & LMS have always used the genre.namesort value to sort genre names. Most 3rd party apps do this too. 16438
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: lms_screen_cap.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16438| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102190 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
