Is this the full text search in 7.9?

Maybe it is.

Most likely it is. Your description sounds exactly like a FTS issue.

Perhaps not so bad if the search results with the search string in the title 
were to appear at the top of the results

That _should_ be the case already. Are you running the latest 7.9 (or at least not older than after Christmas)? I did tune the result sorting at some point, to exactly do what you were looking for: bring direct matches in the title to the top of the list.

Although I am slightly confused.  If I search albums for "Love", I only seem to get 
albums with Love in the title (38 hits) less hits than searching for rainbow?  I'd expect a lot 
more if it found albums containing songs with love in the title.  If I search for "Love" 
in song titles, I get lots of hits (capped at 500?).  Maybe it only does full text search if the 
search string is longer than 4 characters?

I was surprised nobody commented on this behaviour before :-). LMS keeps a list of "hot" keywords, which would return massive result sets. Typically these are words like "the" or as you experienced, "Love". In this case the search would _only_ return hits in the title, and none of the matches in artist names etc. This is simply to guarantee a quick response time, as processing hundreds or thousands of hits obviously is much slower than only a few dozens (or less hundreds :-)).

Full text search may be useful in some situations, but less useful if you know 
what you are trying to find, IMO.  Perhaps would be nice to have Search > 
Artist / Album / Songs / Playlist / Full modes.

As Pippin mentioned it's much less of a full text vs. normal search issue, rather than a how to bring the most relevant hit to the top challenge. Yahoo's directory is dead. Everybody is just using Google or Bing or whomever's full text search. Maybe you could share your library.db file with me, and I'll look in to the particularities of your data once I'm back.

--

Michael
_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta

Reply via email to