cdmackay wrote: > Well, I don't like to rush into these things, you know :)
You and me together, brother! (Or sister. Or I guess I should use "sibling" in this gender plastic Brave New World.) cdmackay wrote: > OK, thanks again - sounds like I could safely start converting my > FLAC-per-disk & cue -> FLAC-per-track with Vorbis comments, and drag > myself kicking and screaming into the 1990s? :) But you have to ask yourself what that effort will buy you. <rant>Yes, cuesheet is a MacGyvered up text format made up to support CD burning in the 1990s. But quite frankly, my impression is that the rest of the metadata formats look like someone rolled them with a very basic intuitive sense of requirements (i.e., music is divided up into cuts performed by groups of musicians, distributed on albums), and then started grafting on other metadata as missed requirements were discovered (music has composers and arrangers, groups sometimes have conductors and soloists, multiple cuts may comprise a single piece, etc.).</rant> If I'm going to put in the effort, I'd like to end up at one well-conceived endpoint, and I don't know where that is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ stephenkca's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7820 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105436 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
