On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Toni Alatalo <[email protected]> wrote: > Knapp kirjoitti: >> bet we would loose all that with QT. PyQT has a restrictive licence >> but QT is good. >> > > This is getting offtopic, but just so that you know, there is also > PythonQt which is actually made for embedding like done in Blender. We > are using it in our Ogre network client app, Naali, to use Qt also from > Python in the c++ app. PythonQt is not GPL but some BSD-like license, > and also comes with wrappers to the qt core & gui etc libs. Then again > Blender itself is GPL like PyQt so I don't know what your point was :)
My thoughts were on the history of Blender and how there was some idea that it could have a commercial branch. If that is still important then a lib with a GPL 3 type license might not be acceptable. I don't know about that end of blender at all though. It was just what I had in mind. -- Douglas E Knapp Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project. http://sf-journey-creations.wikispot.org/Front_Page http://code.google.com/p/perspectiveproject/ _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
