yes, I agree. If by any chance it would be added, "Cone / Pyramid" would be better option.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Harley Acheson <[email protected]>wrote: > > If it's a pyramid it should have it's own create method > > I don't agree... > > We could duplicate the current "cone" code, call it "pyramid", and restrict > it to 3 or 4 sides only. But that would be incorrect because a pyramid can > have any number of sides. So then "cone" and "pyramid" would be identical. > Hmmm... that's because they are basically the same things. > > We could rename our "cone" to "pyramid" or to "Cone / Pyramid" or people > can just get used to the difference in terminology. But having two items in > the list doing the same job with different names seems silly... > > Harley > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
