Thanks for your feedback everybody. I took note of your points and  
will try to rework things accordingly. A few remarks:

[fonts]
My idea was to give the page subtly TeXy flavour by using Latin Modern  
fonts at least for people who have them installed and possibly (hence  
the bandwidth concerns question) by loading them live from the web.  
That's at least cool from the web-design POV, but it seems that the  
approach failed to convince so far.

As Latin Modern Sans doesn't look particularly nice IMO, I think that  
strategy will be out when going sans serif.


[Links]
I'll rearrange the extra links once the font question is settled as  
the width of the font will determine whether they fit in a single line  
or not. If they don't, I'll move the screenshots further up (even  
though that'll probably spoil the markup a little)



[BibTeX]
Not that _I_ have ever used BibDesk with anything other than BibTeX,  
but I think the application's features reach far beyond BibTeX by now  
and it might attract non-TeXie users. Those people always seem to be  
frightened by references to TeX. Perhaps one can mention something  
like 'transparently works with BibTeX' without making explicit, that  
the app was originally designed for it.


[Screenshots]
I'm not tied to the Auto File screenshot. I just needed a third one  
for things to look right and tried to find a place in BibDesk that  
doesn't look too scary but promises to do something obviously useful.  
As BibDesk's document window includes myriads of features in a very  
small space, I don't think that having two screenshots of the window  
will be all that helpful for people looking at it the first time.  
They'll just see two vaguely similar windows there and probably not  
understand the difference between them on first sight.

The image zooming being broken is one of the unfinished aspects. I  
just used a script from the internet and it looks like this one  
doesn't handle long descriptions or the varying image sizes too well.  
I'll have to replace that.


[more information]
If I understand your comments correctly, you want there to be a bit  
more explicit information about BibDesk's features on the page.  
Possibly in the shape of a list whose points are linked to the  
relevant wiki pages. I'll try to find a good selection for that.

Best


                Sven

-- 
Sven-S. Porst . http://earthlingsoft.net/ssp . AIM: cv47al
Pass as best inventor!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop

Reply via email to