Thanks for your feedback everybody.
Mike:
> 1 - the mouseover popups for the features list are nice, but I only
> noticed them by accident. It might be worth making them links as well,
> without changing what they do, just so it's more obvious that they do
> something.
Great idea. I changed that and made sure the links lose their link
colour on hover (to show there's nothing to actually click).
While looking at the links I also removed the bold from the features
and the bullet points from the lists. Looks cleaner like this, but
could it be too clean?
> 2 - the headings along the left are nice, but I'd like them more
> without the brackets.
> 3 - in those headings and in other headings and captions, you use
> all-caps. My preference would be for regular capitalization and the
> headings would still stand out because they're in bold.
Hm, I'm not married to those ideas, but I do consider them part of the
whole design to give a bit of bibliography 'flavour' to the look of
the site.
The site will certainly work without this but I wonder whether it may
be a bit bland.
I put a little conditional in the new version so you can compare both
versions side by side (by moving the mouse in and out of the window).
Christiaan:
> Actually, I think it's a bit slow now.
Bummer, is that slow as in horribly slow? If it is, one may need to
look into dropping frames of the animation. (What kind of machine /
browser are you using?)
> Did you have a look at the SF icons?
No. I think I must have missed that point. I just put text at the
bottom of the page for the time being.
Looking at their wiki suggests that we are 'encouraged' to use the
logo and that it's used for access statistics. Does anybody use these
statistics?
> I'm seeing a little div at the top when I (re)load the page. It goes
> away when I click on a screenshot. I think it's a caption.
Thanks, I didn't move the CSS properly. Got that one. (just the
solution you mention)
BTW, is there any chance we have an original file for the icon?
Looking at it in the header there suggests that the shadow on the
right is cut off. That may be worth fixing in the icon itself.
> BTW, I was wondering if it's possible to make the screenshots links to
> separate pages on browsers with JS support turned off rather than
> showing
> the divs at the bottom.
They actually do with the script used in this variant (which is
another reason why I prefer it over the one I tried in the index2.html
version). If JS doesn't work, all that remains is a direct link to the
image file. (One does lose the description that way, though).
Adam:
> It looks like the headings are one table-row up from the corresponding
> text in the second column. I think it would look better if they were
> flush at the top with the text they are meant to "head."
I want the baselines to be flush but that didn't work for the first
heading (because of the larger size of the download link). I fixed
that now, even though in a different way than you suggested.
I also added a 16px BibDesk icon as a favicon now. But I don't really
think it comes out too well at that size. So I'm wondering whether it
might be a better idea to use the paperclip icon there, particularly
as the big BibDesk icon is visible on the page anyway.
Current version at
http://earthlingsoft.net/ssp/bibdesk/bibdesk/index4.html
Sven
--
Sven-S. Porst . http://earthlingsoft.net/ssp . AIM: cv47al
Pass as best inventor!
Sven
--
Sven-S. Porst . http://earthlingsoft.net/ssp . AIM: cv47al
Pass as best inventor!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
