On Dec 5, 2013, at 23:21, Colin A. Smith wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 22:42, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 19:41, Colin A. Smith wrote: >> >>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 19:01, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I guess so, it looks like it's generated (which also makes it unreadable.) >>>> Then someone should regenerate it. My point is that I cannot write the >>>> code, as best I can make some small changes if they're trivial. >>> >>> Because changes were made to the auto generated code afterwards, it needs >>> to be generated again (with wsdl2objc), then diffed against the current >>> files, and only the relevant changes merged (by hand). >> >> The current code for the WOK classes has all changes reverted, because it >> did not work anyway. > > The changes I was referring to were made much earlier by ununnilium (me), > hofman, and amaxwell in revisions 18803, 18804, 19276, and 19499. I’d guess > the merging wouldn't be terribly difficult with FileMerge and would probably > be best done by me. I have more family responsibilities now and am not sure > how soon I can get to it (i.e. it might be about a week or so). > >>>>>> BTW, what version should we really be using? WokSearch or WokSearchLite? >>>>>> Currently it's going for the former. >>>>> >>>>> Ideally it would be an option; isn't this a tiered access scheme, where >>>>> some institutions only pay for the lite service? ISTR that the guy who >>>>> wrote it (Colin?) only had access to one of them. >>>>> >>>>> Adam >>>> >>>> Whoever wrote it had access to WokSearch, so he should have access to both >>>> I guess. >>>> >>>> The code does not allow such a choice, it is either one or the other. Some >>>> of these strings are hard coded and put in global variables. >>> >>> I had access to both WokSearch and WokSearchLite when I wrote the code. >>> WokSearchLite was much more limited and didn’t do what I wanted to, so >>> given limited time, I only wrote code to support WokSearch. >> >> Is it possible to support both at the same time, with some easy switch, and >> without the hard coded and global stuff? > > It’s of course possible to support both and make it user friendly, but again > my time is pretty limited right now. Also, I’m much less familiar with the UI > part of BibDesk, but that’s only a secondary issue. Could you be more > specific about what you mean by the hard coded global stuff? > > Cheers, > > Colin
The choice between Light or Premium services is in the various URLs, which are hard coded into the code, and are set un the USGlobals singleton. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
