On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:38, Adam R. Maxwell <amaxw...@mac.com> wrote: > On Mar 27, 2014, at 14:43, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am a bit hesitant with this. It is probably the quickest and easiest to >> implement, but it does not really feel like a database setting (i.e. a >> choice of database). So this would be very counter intuitive. And then >> there's the conflict with the old way, so backwards compatibility problems. > > I don't really like any of the proposed solutions, but they're all running up > against a long-time scalability problem since we originally just had a couple > of search group types. The right thing to do is probably have a sheet > xib/controller pair per-search group class. Personally, I'd rather see WOK > and WOK Lite as separate search groups, if there's no automagic way to just > use the (best) one that works. I'm not entirely confident that the average > user would figure out a checkbox or radio button, since they may not even > know which subscription they have. > > Adam
I tend to like the idea of having separate search groups for WOK and WOK Lite as well. Cheeers, Colin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
