On Dec 21, 2007, at 1:18 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > Isn't 60-70 characters per line the optimum value for minimal eye > strain? There's a reason for LaTeX's crazy narrow \textwidth. > > Anyway, I hacked together a sample this evening and posted a > screenshot here: > > http://homepage.mac.com/amaxwell/.cv/amaxwell/Sites/.Public/detail_table.jpg-zip.zip > > and a partly working demo here: > > http://homepage.mac.com/amaxwell/.Public/BibDesk.app.zip > > The content of the table on the right would be determined by a > template. Right now it's just a subset of the current detail view, > and it uses the new Leopard gradient because I was curious about it. > Anyone think this is worth pursuing?
This is similar to what I had in mind, assuming that the right side is templated so its content can be adjusted, and that the width of the right pane retains its last setting on restarting the program, etc (I'd set it wider than the demo jpg for abstract display). I do think the display at the bottom works pretty well for multiple attachments. However, I don't think this is worth an argument if there's a strong sentiment against it among the developers. Jim Harrison UVa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
