I think that the current setup is probably optimal; for those who wish to view their papers, the Preview pane can be set to "linked file" (perhaps there should be a way of selecting which linked file is displayed?), while the existing thumbnails should be good enough to identify which of several items is the one that you want to look at.
Another option would be to just have an optional setting to put the bottom pane on the right-hand-side for those of us with very wide monitors; some people prefer Mail to be in a three-pane side-by-side format, this might benefit as well. -AHM On 2007-12-20, at 10:18 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > Isn't 60-70 characters per line the optimum value for minimal eye > strain? There's a reason for LaTeX's crazy narrow \textwidth. > > Anyway, I hacked together a sample this evening and posted a > screenshot here: > > http://homepage.mac.com/amaxwell/.cv/amaxwell/Sites/.Public/detail_table.jpg-zip.zip > > and a partly working demo here: > > http://homepage.mac.com/amaxwell/.Public/BibDesk.app.zip > > The content of the table on the right would be determined by a > template. Right now it's just a subset of the current detail view, > and it uses the new Leopard gradient because I was curious about it. > Anyone think this is worth pursuing? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
