Eric, I think you're being paranoid. The only suggestion below is to start a discussion board so we can have more than one thread going at the same time. There are MANY topics beyond smart growth and land use that people may want to discuss and it is easier to follow ALL the myriad discussions from a discussion board than from an email listserv.
You can still have your own thread, or comment on a thread about smart growth if you so desire - this change wouldn't be about YOU even though I know it's tempting for you to think so. -Kirk On Nov 8, 2007 12:35 PM, Eric Westhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Bikies "critics", > > The move is on to solidify against "inner sanctum heresy." The > suggestions seem to be those which: > > 1. Keep threads separated so that one can more easily read only from > other "faithful"--whatever the flavor or topic. > > 2. Provide edited and censored news streams acceptable to the dogma of > the "Faithful" over simply posting general links of different views. > > 3. As of yet--not thought of--methods of exclusion and preventions of > "bothersome" views or downright heresy. > > EW > __________________ > -- Mitchell Nussbaum Wrote: > > This might be a good time to ask if bikies has outgrown the software > that > currently supports it. Perhaps discussions would be easier to follow > (or > ignore, if that's what you want) if we had a discussion board that > supports threading. A discussion board might be easier to administer, > too. > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies > -- Kirk Rappe Masters of Urban Planning College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Washington | 608 | 215-4590 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
