Too bad District 2 has no alder. Thanks, Marsha, for filling the gap.

Bikies, does anyone live in district 2? (Lake Mendota side of East Wash.)

Al

> Marsha,
>
> Thanks for seeking input on this.
>
> It may be helpful if we ask the rhetorical question: What is the
> appropriate response from the city if road is blocked to all vehicular
> traffic during a construction project in a similar manner - i.e. all lanes
> in one direction, suddenly, without warning, without anyone present to
> help direct traffic?
>
> Answer: We've come up with a system that enables to keep this from
> happening.
>
> When one direction of automobile flow is completely blocked, there are
> signs up ahead of time informing us of the upcoming lane closures.  When
> available, there are signed detours that allow us to drive around the
> construction area, and when necessary, there are members of the
> construction crew dedicated to making sure that auto traffic passes
> safely.
>
> It may cost more from the city up front, but I think it should be written
> into construction contracts that are on or will spill onto public lands
> that bike lanes and bike paths should be safely maintained throughout the
> construction project when possible.  Otherwise there ought to be ample
> signage declaring the lane/path closures, along with reasonable signed
> detours for cyclists - meaning that they don't have to dismount or go more
> than ~1/4 mile out of their way (this is similar to sending a car ~8
> blocks out of the way on a detour).  When a detour is not available, then
> auto/cycling traffic should be directed by dedicated construction crew
> members as to make it safe for all users of the road.
>
> As a cyclist sharing the road with cars, I view this as a road rights and
> road-use priority issue, but I think the city should put this squarely in
> the realm of A-1 public safety.  If I were driving a car down E. Johnson
> and a bike was forced to suddenly swerve into the lane I was occupying it
> puts us, and the other road users around us, all in an extremely dangerous
> situation.
>
> -India Viola
>
> On 08/30/10, "Rummel, Marsha"  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey All-
>>
>> One of my constituents emailed me and TE staff wondering what the
>> responsibility of contractors is to maintain bike lanes during
>> construction. The location in question is Blair at E Johnson.
>>
>> "Today, for the fourth time in about a week, the bike lane was blocked
>> on East Johnson. Right in front of the Krupp construction project--sorry
>> I don't know the cross street, but it should be obvious. This is very
>> dangerous, a sudden block of a path with no warning, and heavy traffic
>> speeding by (far over the speed limit). This isn't the first time this
>> has been a problem with construction blocking a bike lane. Specifically
>> as this site, there is often debris (sand, gravel, etc), vehicles, and
>> materials blocking the path."
>>
>> David Dryer sent the attached pdf files with the following comments:
>>
>> "This is an on-street bike lane, TE reviews and makes conditions for two
>> types of permits, Street Opening, and Street Occupancy. SOpening permits
>> are administered by CE and SOccupancys by BI (for now). When there is a
>> violation of the permit and TE is made aware-as people think these are
>> TE permits, we contact  the contractor and request compliance, we read
>> em the riot act, the whole drill---often times they say they will
>> comply, some do, some do for a period of time, some do not, and some
>> repeat. TE  does not have any authority to terminate a permit, to kick a
>> permittee out of the street, nor do we have any authority to write a
>> citation. We do have the “threat” of not signing off on a permit
>> renewal. It is often cheaper for the permittee to use a street than to
>> make accommodations for themselves on private property. We do recognize
>> that in an urban setting often there is no alternative than the publics
>> space, in those cases then we want accommodations made for the displaced
>> public users. They are told this. Attached is a scan of this permit. In
>> this instance you can see the blue line on the plan that shows the bike
>> lane is to remain open and outside the WZ fence."
>>
>> My constituent responded after getting the above: "Seems to me that it's
>> clearly not working, and that contractors have no incentive (positive or
>> negative) to keep public spaces open and safe. And a good example of
>> enforcement, review, and control being disconnected. Can you imagine if
>> a construction site just randomly closed a car lane during rush
>> hour--I'm guessing then there'd be some consequences."
>>
>> TE read the contractor the 'riot act' but it does seem like there is a
>> disconnect...I'd like your advice on this.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marsha
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bikies mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> --
> India Viola
> Stretton Lab
> 115 Zoology Research
> 1117 W. Johnson St.
> Madison, WI 53706
> 608.262.3336
>
> "How can we learn from our mistakes if we don't first acknowledge them?"
> -Anonymous
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to