The bike rack that you parked at off Dayton St was one of only about 36 bike
parking stalls (out of more than 200 total) that is NOT covered. If you had
looked at any other side of the building, you would have found covered racks.

 

Union South's garage wasn't intended to be hostile to bikes. It wasn't
intended to be hostile to cars, either, but it is.

The main difference is that we can provide parking for bikes elsewhere, so we
did. We cannot provide parking for cars elsewhere, so they are still allowed
in.

 

(Re)construction of Memorial Union is imminent.

The plan there is to provide at least as much parking as the current demand.

But even that is going to require compromises on either the convenience of
the racks themselves (using higher capacity racks that are somewhat harder to
use) or their number.

 

Indeed, the plan everywhere on campus is to provide at least as much bike
parking as there is demand, and, as difficult as that is, it is much easier
to do within the context of multimillion dollar construction projects. So we
are steadily making progress, but it will take us several years to meet our
current goals (and, like the construction of more road capacity for cars,
when you plan to meet peak demand, your target capacity is constantly
increasing).

Chuck Strawser 
Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Planner 
Commuter Solutions 
Transportation Services 
UW-Madison 
Room 124 WARF 
610 Walnut St 
Madison WI 53726 
608-263-2969 
www.wisc.edu/trans 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Robert F. Nagel
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:40 AM
To: STRAWSER, Charles
Cc: bikies
Subject: Re: [Bikies] rant about union south parking garage bike ban

 

The bike rack I ended up parking in was just to the east of the garage ramp
along dayton street wasn't covered. I didn't think to look around for a
covered one. I had no reason to expect I would find one, given that the logic
I had employed in expecting to find space underground was flawed, or was it
Union South's logic that was flawed?

 

That the proposed bike station came in a half a million dollars explains why
it didn't happen, but it doesn't explain why the parking garage must be
hostile to bikes. 

 

It seems that construction on Memorial Union is imminent. What's the plan for
bikes there?
---
Robert F. Nagel
[email protected]
www.nagel-law.com
Thirty on the Square, 10th Floor
30 W. Mifflin St., Suite 1001
Madison, WI  53703
608-255-1501 office
608-255-1504 fax
608-438-9501 cell



On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, STRAWSER, Charles <[email protected]>
wrote:

Robert,

The design for Union South and its underground parking garage were decided
before I was hired to work at the University (and before the current director
of Transportation was hired, as well) so I don't know who made all the
decisions or why. 

 

But I can tell you that about 60% of the new bike racks around Union South
are covered, including the ones between the north side of Wendt and the SW
corner or Union South, many of the ones on the east façade of Union South
facing Computer Science, and all of the racks on the north side of Union
South are very well covered. I'm not sure why racks in the parking garage,
even if they existed, would be preferable to the racks at street level that
are covered, especially since many of them (though not all) are covered as
well as they would be in the parking garage.

Granted, those racks are often full (just as the uncovered racks are often
full) because the bike parking provided does not meet observed demand, a
situation that Transportation Services hopes to avoid with all future major
construction projects by bringing data on demand for bike parking to the
table long before the architects have fleshed out a concept. But your
complaint seemed to be more about the lack of covered bike parking than an
insufficient amount.

 

The steep ramp down into Union South's garage, and the extremely tight
turning radii means that negotiating the ramp is very difficult for cars,
even before the access control gates were installed. For those reasons, the
current director of Transportation Services would prefer not to encourage
bicycles from entering and navigating that ramp. He is not opposed to bike
parking in any ramps, and there are bike racks in many of the Universities
ramps; he is just concerned about bicyclists' safety in some of the more
challenging ones. I do not know why police were training in there. Perhaps it
was specifically because the challenges there would make their training more
effective.

 

Also, parking your bike in that garage might have been your first choice, but
it would not necessarily have been every cyclist's first choice. I have been
specifically told by several women that they will not use the existing bike
racks in some other ramps because they do not feel comfortable accessing
those racks alone. So what you presumed to be the best option for bicyclists
is not necessarily what every cyclist would want.

 

Lastly, as I posted before to this list, the estimate for the bike station at
Union South was for roughly a half a million dollars, not "several thousand
dollars." "Several thousand dollars" wouldn't even have covered the cost of
the, er, covered racks that were installed outside the new Union South.

Chuck Strawser 
Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Planner 
Commuter Solutions 
Transportation Services 
UW-Madison 
Room 124 WARF 
610 Walnut St 
Madison WI 53726 
608-263-2969 
www.wisc.edu/trans 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert F. Nagel
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 6:33 PM
To: bikies
Subject: [Bikies] rant about union south parking garage bike ban

 

I understand that a bike-station-thingy was considered, but rejected at Union
South, but I was surprised when I was shooed away trying to park by bike in
bike racks that I presumed existed in the parking garage. It was raining, so
I thought that would be a good place to park my bike. I had associated the
garage with bikes because I had been in the garage once when police were
doing bike-police training. My first red flag that I wasn't welcome was the
gates were within inches of the cement wall and I had to shimmy past them.
Then I was met by some sort of attendant who scolded me and sent me back out
into the rain telling me that bikes are not allowed in the garage, as if it
should have been obvious to me. That seemed crazy until I realized there
weren't any bike racks down there anyway, which is, also, of course, crazy.

 

So, what happened here? I mean it's one thing to get out-maneuvered when
you're trying to add several thousand dollars on to a $100 million project
(or whatever bike stations and unions souths cost), but it's another thing to
end up with a ban on bikes and without a single steel bar to lock your bike
to in the whole garage.
---
Robert F. Nagel
[email protected]
www.nagel-law.com
Thirty on the Square, 10th Floor
30 W. Mifflin St., Suite 1001
Madison, WI  53703
608-255-1501 office
608-255-1504 fax
608-438-9501 cell

 

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to