The mention of the facilities not paid by tax dollars implied that the
public doesn't have a say in how the facilities are built or used. But
if it's on taxpayer-funded land, then arguably the public does have a say.
On 2011/10/19 18:45, [email protected] wrote:
How does who owns and owned what relate to bikes parking in parking garages?
Sent from my U.S. Cellular BlackBerry® smartphone
-----Original Message-----
From: "Michael Rewey"<[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:28:30
To:<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Bikies] rant about union south parking garage bike ban
All correct, but the City vacated a significant amount of R/W on Johnson Street
so the Union
could expand to the north - more land than what the UW donated on Randall.
Mike Rewey
--------------------------------------------------
On 19 Oct 2011 at 8:24, KENNEDY, Robert wrote:
That is correct. It´s UW/Regents property and U South was paid for with
student seg fees. UW also donated land to the City for new right of way so
that we could put new bike lanes on Randall Ave.
Rob
Rob Kennedy, Ph.D.
Senior Transportation Planner
University of Wisconsin-Madison
610 Walnut St., 120 C WARF
Madison, WI 53726
608/263-1034
Fax 608/265-3424
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Paul T. O'Leary
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 8:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] rant about union south parking garage bike ban
What about the land that the building and garage sit on?
On 2011/10/18 17:13, Martin Lund wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, Union South and the Union South Parking Garage are
UW property and the entire rebuild was paid for via student seg fees and
private donations. In other words: No tax dollars were spent.
Is this correct?
--
Paul T. O'Leary
Chronic Nuisance
Madison, WI USA
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
