On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Henry Baragar wrote:
>At the conceptual level, your structure works well.  However, most first 
>time binc users do not have a clear conceptual understanding of binc and 
>its operational beahaviour (other than it is an IMAP server).  That is, 
>The procedures that work best for first time users are those that are very 
>mechanical and have the users looking for specific  information in 
>(...)

I agree on what you are stating here, both for beginners and experienced 
users. What I personally prefer when I'm troubleshooting is to have a 
wizard-like behavior that narrows down my problem, giving me little tests 
to perform along the way.

If we can make the Wiki become such a wizard for troubleshooting, then I
believe 80% of the problems can be solved offlist, which means there will
be more happy Binc users. :-)

><SIDE NOTE>
>I would like to see severity level tags added to the error messages, where 
>the severity indicates the capability of a client to communicate with the 
>server.  For example, an "error" level would indicate that the client 
>(...)

Ooooh yes I want that too. :-) I've been thinking about a way to make it 
look good too, but we can discuss that on binc-dev.

>Yes, that is the problem... the FAQ has more information!-)  When I have a 
>problem, I WANT IT FIXED RIGHT NOW, particularly if I have a thousand 
>users screaming at me (which fortunately, I personally don't).  I want go 
>to www.bincimap.org and click on a clearly labelled and easily found link 
>near the top of the page that takes me directly to the problem resolution 
>procedures.  I already know what binc is, why you started writing, its 
>advantages, etc., etc., etc (ref:  

Yes, I totally agree with you. I can make the link clearer on the front 
page, but then we also have to start getting the Wiki up to shape.

Whenever I from now on update the FAQ, I will also update the Wiki to 
ensure that the information is at the right place.

Is there a way to dump/crawl/spider the entire Wiki, including a "snap 
shot" in a distribution? (AndyG?)

Andy :-)

--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen   | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg
Author of Binc IMAP      |  "It is better not to do something
http://www.bincimap.org/ |        than to do it poorly."


Reply via email to