On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: >Should I update to 1.2.9final or perhaps something newer? I held off >just because the updates to the newer ones didn't seem to involve my >problems, and I figured making lots of changes is not so good for the >troubleshooting :)
Please do use the most recent version, yes. There are no known regressions since the last releases. >I suppose one other odd thing about my setup right now... I've got the >idle timeout set all the way down to 60 seconds. I'm using relay-ctrl, >and I found that even 5 minutes had times where someone using the server >would pass the timeout for relay-ctrl default of 15 minutes, since >relay-ctrl only gets called at the beginning of a session... I don't >know if such a short timeout might make binc confused in some cases. Binc IMAP uses a timeout of 1800 seconds if you set it to something less. This is because Binc IMAP isn't allowed to break the IMAP protocol ever, and 30 minutes is the shortest allowed IMAP timeout. So Binc shouldn't get confused by this at all. The logs will state clearly whether the server closes because of a timeout, or because the client disconnected. If this doesn't match what's happening on your system, then it's a bug that needs to be fixed. :-) Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
