Hi,

>Christian Hoener zu Siederdissen <choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at> writes:
>
>> In that case, I would put onto hackage a library "BiobaseBLAST" which
>> has the Biobase.BLAST.Tabulated.* modules
>> (.hs /.Import.hs / .Export.hs) with an Iteratee interface.
>
>Okay!
>
>BTW, do you wish to continue using the 'Biobase' infix and top-level
>namespace?  My personal opinion is that we should standardize on
>bioxxxx and Bio, in the name of consistency, as well as to try to
>eradicate personal ownership of code.  I'd like to hear what you (both
>singular and pleural) think, though.

Ok, if nobody here objects, I'll switch to naming libraries according
to this plan. Btw, "bio-infernal", "bioInfernal", or what? I'd say
"bio-infernal" for easier readability. And then on the module level,
you find Bio.Infernal which just re-exports, and otherwise
Bio.Infernal.Something.(Im/Ex)port.

In general, I happily accept these things, if we get a nice common name
scheme out of it, which we seem to be doing.

I'll however wait with renaming a few days and continue pushing updates
using the current scheme, just to give other people a chance to comment
-- I think many people are on holidays?

>
>Anyway, I just chunked out the PSL stuff, it's about as simple as it
>gets, but uses a similar (tab-separated words) format.
>
>> You factor out the XML part and then we check if we should put
>> everything into one library? Or should we try out having one library?
>
>Yep.  I'm not going to hurry with this, I'll pick the low hanging fruit
>first.

Ok, then there will be BiobaseBLAST, later on I'll switch to bio-blast
and we should have just that one library doing all the blast-related
stuff with both your and mine code.
Though I'll just wait a bit before publishing, maybe we have some
comments before long -- and I have to finish up some other things,
before anyway.

>
>> ... It would be easier if hackage had a good way to mark librarier as
>> deprecated so they don't show up anymore. Or do they have and I just
>> don't know it?
>
>I don't think so, there's been talk about it, but AFIAK, no action.

>
>-k
>-- 
>If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of
>giants _______________________________________________
>Biohaskell mailing list
>Biohaskell@biohaskell.org
>http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
_______________________________________________
Biohaskell mailing list
Biohaskell@biohaskell.org
http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell

Reply via email to