That sounds good. Do you envision this just being a facade for
RNA/DNATools, or move the functionality into GeneticCodes and forward from
RNA/DNATools to the new class? I can go either way.
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Down [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:57 AM
> To: Cox, Greg
> Cc: 'Thomas Down'; Keith James; biojava-l (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] RNATools.translate
>
>
> I guess there's always option 3:
>
> - Add a new `placeholder' class called something like
> GeneticCodes, which becomes the new common calling
> point for getting the translation tables, and also
> the convenience `translate' methods.
>
> Once the method is there, it makes a lot of sense to have
> something that can handle both DNA and RNA. I must admit
> I like this option...
>
> Thomas.
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
