On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:38:43AM -0400, Cox, Greg wrote:
> That sounds good. Do you envision this just being a facade for
> RNA/DNATools, or move the functionality into GeneticCodes and forward from
> RNA/DNATools to the new class? I can go either way.
It's not hugely important, so long as all the right convenience
methods are there. If we're going to have a class of that
name, it makes sense that all the genetic-code-table loading
stuff should live there, so I guess this sounds like the
latter option...
Thomas.
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
