On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I guess this didn't help. How about %before-defines and %after-defines? > > "%before-definitions" and "%after-definitions" might be a bit clearer,
That's fine. > (if anything in this area could be considered to be clear :-). If there are no specific objections raised in the next day or so, I'll commit the above. For a moment there, I thought both you and Akim were in favor of the first patch again, but I hope not. Joel
