On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
> > depending on context? That would match %{...%}'s behavior.
>
> Since we are looking for a new syntax, I would prefer to make it
> clearer and independent of the order. For a start, it will also help
> make things more understandable when we have an %import feature.
Although I'm not sure how %import will go, I was also concerned about how
my first patch would limit it.
> To gain in symmetry, we could also used pre-union and post-union?
> Bah. Dunno.
I hate to tie it to the union since these are useful without a union.
Joel
