On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Le 16 juin 06 à 18:29, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
>
> > I modeled this after pre-prologue and post-prologue. (Speaking of
> > confusing names... pre=before, post=after, but the pre-prologue and the
> > post-prologue are not before and after the prologue. They *are* the
> > prologue, right?
>
> Right. pre and post were meant to say first part and last part of.
>
> I have other sick proposals :) How about %preamble, and %postamble?
> Or prequel and sequel :) alpha, omega.
Are we now talking about replacing %{...%} with something more explicit,
or just choosing different terminology for the documentation?
Joel
