On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I think the right way so people don't invent deviant things is to > increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can > hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" if the > "what" is a hash for example > Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think we'll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios. -- Christopher Allen
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
