On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 07:36:05PM -0230, Philip Johnson wrote:
> > Open for discussion and flame.
>
> Okay, here's my take on what you're trying to say:
>
> If this windowmanager is Brad Hughes' window manager, why did he release
> it to the public? Of course, the simple answer is so that other people can
> use it, enjoy it, pass the word along, etc.
I think Blackbox appeals to a certain type of user. I've tried 'em all and prefer
Blackbox because of what Blackbox is.
However, I can also appreciate how somebody loves the way it is, and would like it
even more if they could just "get this one feature added... only one". :->
Would it be possible for one of the "powers that be" to write up a simple list of what
Blackbox will have, what it might have (if there exists enough interest) and what it
will not have under any circumstances? Or even a voting mechanism such as Everybuddy
has/had for feature requests. That is if the authors agree.
I know there is documentation stating in general terms the goal(s) for Blackbox, but
maybe there needs something more detailed, such as:
IconBox = No (will never happen)
Autohide Toolbar = Yes (currently implemented)
Or, maybe I'm just blowing hot air again....
--
J.D.
PGP signature
