Philip Johnson wrote:
>
> > Open for discussion and flame.
>
> Okay, here's my take on what you're trying to say:
>
> If this windowmanager is Brad Hughes' window manager, why did he release
> it to the public? Of course, the simple answer is so that other people can
> use it, enjoy it, pass the word along, etc.
>
> Now, using this logic, doesn't that lead to the inevitable request for
> features that the userbase, which is no longer just Brad Hughes, because
> of the release to the public, is looking for?
>
blah blah blah. I use blacbox because it is free of those
anoying fancy boy features. Thanks for ignoring these
lame requests.
