Gregory J. Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Nowhere in my e-mail did I
> question the mood, character, intelligence, or motivation of
> anyone. You managed to do so completely without basis.
Really? You stated "it wouldn't kill you to do some reasonable testing
before jumping in", to make a statement like this does all of the above. It
questions the poster's intelligence, motivation, character, and quite
possibly even mood.
> I was merely asking that those who post to this list first read the
> questions they are trying to answer and then do reasonable
> testing to be sure of the validity of their claims.
To make a statement to this effect directly in response to someone's post
indicates your opinion that they haven't already done these things.
> While what you said was correct, it
> only served to mislead the discussion, as you did not address
> the reported problem, but a separate, similar issue.
And I have apologized for my confusion.
> Addressing the EXACT question
> tends to be the most efficient way to solve a problem.
Do you honestly think I would intentionally mislead? I thought I was
responding to his EXACT problem, and have apologized for my error.
> This is indeed a discussion list, and I should hope that
> everyone on it restricts future discussions to the topic
> at hand, rather than attacking others.
Until personally attacked, I did. I would expect anyone getting a response
like that directly to one of their posts would react similarly.
Jamin W. Collins
