Hmmm. Yeah, I agree with you on the style plugin, and I'm not quite
sure I'm 100% satisfied with it myself. My biggest issue is that I
can't see the style plugin laying out cleanly with more branches than it
has right now. In other words, if you took out all the tabs and added
all those to the tree, I see it getting ugly and even more confusing
than it is.
On the rolling your own configure script, while that's a neat thing to
do, I'm not sure I necessarily want to go there, especially with all the
crap that is involved with this project with Qt and X and c++ devel
packages and all. And I don't understand why you have to remove
/usr/bin/auto* for this to compile on your box--what's up with that? =:)
* [09/16/01 21:01] Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world,
* Kyle Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> walks into mine and says:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jason Kasper wrote:
> > Umm, while this is a good stress-reliever for you, I'm sure, it doesn't
> > really help me at all. Any helpful suggestions on the following points?
> > Such as how to fix the autocrap/configure system? Any suggestions on
> > how to make the style plugin better?
> >
>
> I would have probably hand-hacked my own ./configure script. That's what I
> did with my dingOS userland distributions
> (http://www.pointlessmovement.net/dingOS).
>
> About the style plugin: my reason for calling it 'cumbersome' is that it
> just seems faster for me to use a tree than a tabbed dialog (meaning, I
> liked toolbox's interface better)
>
> --
> Kyle Donaldson
> Movement Without Reason
> "Our company is like Microsoft quality, a figment of your imagination"
--
----%<----------%<----
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
