On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jason Kasper wrote:
> Hmmm.  Yeah, I agree with you on the style plugin, and I'm not quite
> sure I'm 100% satisfied with it myself.  My biggest issue is that I
> can't see the style plugin laying out cleanly with more branches than it
> has right now.  In other words, if you took out all the tabs and added
> all those to the tree, I see it getting ugly and even more confusing
> than it is.

I know, and that's why I'm going to be using toolbox for any (if any)
styles I create.

> On the rolling your own configure script, while that's a neat thing to
> do, I'm not sure I necessarily want to go there, especially with all the
> crap that is involved with this project with Qt and X and c++ devel
> packages and all.  And I don't understand why you have to remove
> /usr/bin/auto* for this to compile on your box--what's up with that? =:)

I've been trying to come up with a faster script that handles all of that,
but it's going to take a while. Afterwards, it should be quite easy to
update. I think that the rest of the app is good, although I wouldn't have
had the command tree for bbkeys open by default.

The reason for removing /usr/bin/auto* was because the creators of auto*,
in all of their wisdom, decided that if those programs happen to exist on
your system, ./configure should be rebuilt and rerun when you *attempt* to
run make.

I say *attempt* because I have never seen a machine where those damned
auto* scripts actually work.

-- 
Kyle Donaldson
Movement Without Reason
"Our company is like Microsoft quality, a figment of your imagination"

Reply via email to