How does Ankur and his builds fit into further QS development? <http://lipidity.com/>
> Frankly, I'm unsure about completely selling my soul to Google, I feel similarly negative about selling my soul to Google. Though the momentum and manpower behind QSB is quite attractive. > But QSB is open-source, anyone can make custom builds stripping out > anything that may be compromising privacy - this is already done for > Chrome. I wouldn't worry about this. > > If the best QS II will come from QSB, then work from that base and > benefit from help from others, otherwise if we can't get the features > which make QS the best interface on the planet into QSB, then...: Sounds like a good idea worthy of more exploration. I haven't found anything (launchbar, qsb, butler) as intuitive as QS's 3-pane bezel interface nor have I found a trigger system like QS. > > > I'd love to see some more Cocoa programmers willing to help you out, I wish I had the time to learn and do :-( > Etienne, thanks again for all your effort!!! :beer: Yes! Thanks Etienne!
