Until QSB 1) has a third pane, and 2) lets me create Applescript actions, I'm not interested in it. Maybe one day they will let that happen, but until then I remain interested in development of Quicksilver.
On Feb 13, 1:02 pm, iota <[email protected]> wrote: > How does Ankur and his builds fit into further QS development? > <http://lipidity.com/> > > > Frankly, I'm unsure about completely selling my soul to Google, > > I feel similarly negative about selling my soul to Google. Though the > momentum and manpower behind QSB is quite attractive. > > > But QSB is open-source, anyone can make custom builds stripping out > > anything that may be compromising privacy - this is already done for > > Chrome. I wouldn't worry about this. > > > If the best QS II will come from QSB, then work from that base and > > benefit from help from others, otherwise if we can't get the features > > which make QS the best interface on the planet into QSB, then...: > > Sounds like a good idea worthy of more exploration. I haven't found > anything (launchbar, qsb, butler) as intuitive as QS's 3-pane bezel > interface nor have I found a trigger system like QS. > > > > > I'd love to see some more Cocoa programmers willing to help you out, > > I wish I had the time to learn and do :-( > > > Etienne, thanks again for all your effort!!! :beer: > > Yes! Thanks Etienne!
