On Oct 15, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Andres Koropecki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok it seems that my impatience blew up my perception of time. I just timed it 
> and it took around 18 seconds. Still that's ridiculously long for what it's 
> supposed to do.

Yes, and prior to the change I referenced, I would have expected it to take at 
least half the time it takes now. Seems like you’d have noticed if it was 
taking 9 seconds.

Have you tried it in B69 to confirm for sure that it’s a new problem? It’s 
available from https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver/downloads

> BTW something that may be useful to know is that after the first long delay 
> before moving into the folder, if I try to access the folder again after a 
> while it works with no delay (so whatever causes the delay seems to be 
> something that is being cached).

Yes, it should cache that type of thing for a while.

> Could anyone try and see if they can replicate my problem?

I don’t have a folder with 400 PDFs. :-) The closest thing is probably a folder 
with 176 music videos, but I see no delay whatsoever going into that. In any 
case, I’m on an SSD, so I don’t think I’d be able to reproduce the delay (if 
it’s disk-related). Hopefully someone else can track it down.

-- 
Rob McBroom
<http://www.skurfer.com/>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quicksilver" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en.


Reply via email to