Just an update: It seems that whenever I restart the system, I get the 
temporary hang (for about 20 sec) when entering a folder full of pdf's with 
QS. But after that, even if I restart QS, and even if I delete the QS 
caches (~/Library/Caches/Quicksilver/ and ~/Library/Caches/com.
blacktree.Quicksilver/), it loads the same folder instantly. How on earth 
is that possible? If this is not caused by something being cached to those 
files, then what??

On Monday, October 15, 2012 4:41:08 PM UTC-3, koro wrote:
>
> On 10/15/12 3:15 PM, Rob McBroom wrote: 
> > Have you tried it in B69 to confirm for sure that it�s a new problem? 
> > It�s available from 
> > https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver/downloads 
>
> I've tried and it and I don't get any delay at all (less than half a 
> second). 
>
> I deleted the caches before trying (i.e. 
> ~/Library/Caches/Quicksilver/ 
> ~/Library/Caches/com.blacktree.Quicksilver/ 
> ) 
>
> But now it's getting hard to reproduce the problem. Even if i delete the 
> caches, both B69 and B70 are loading the folders with many files inside 
> like a breeze (which makes me think that stuff is being cached somewhere 
> else?). I'm puzzled. 
>
> OTOH, while trying with different folders containing many files, I got a 
> different (maybe related?) problem. I tried to navigate into a folder 
> with 189 files (jpgs and a few avis copied from a digital camera, of a 
> total size of 1.34 GB) and I got a brief beachball and then a crash (i 
> sent a crash report). The second time (after starting QS again) it 
> opened the same folder quickly and showing the thumbnails properly. 
>   Maybe this was random; I tried another folder with 900 pictures 
> (almost 3GB) and no problem, took about 4-5 seconds to open. 
>
> I'll keep trying to reproduce the problem. 
>
> >> BTW something that may be useful to know is that after the first 
> >> long delay before moving into the folder, if I try to access the 
> >> folder again after a while it works with no delay (so whatever 
> >> causes the delay seems to be something that is being cached). 
> > 
> > Yes, it should cache that type of thing for a while. 
> > 
> >> Could anyone try and see if they can replicate my problem? 
> > 
> > I don�t have a folder with 400 PDFs. :-) The closest thing is 
> > probably a folder with 176 music videos, but I see no delay 
> > whatsoever going into that. In any case, I�m on an SSD, so I don�t 
> > think I�d be able to reproduce the delay (if it�s disk-related). 
> > Hopefully someone else can track it down. 
> > 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quicksilver" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en.


Reply via email to