Le 10 oct. 2013 à 11:09, Patrick Robertson <[email protected]> a écrit :
> When working on the right arrowing into Activity Monitor business, I noticed > what Lucas said - currently the way of retrieving processes can be 'flaky'. > This is partly the fault of Apple: there's no simple way of accessing a list > of background/daemon/non-UI processes, so we're stuck at the moment. Just to point out that it might be our fault (I've rewritten that part, so I ought to know) ;-). I'm wondering if switching to NSRunningApplication could make it more stable (right now it's still relying on Carbon Process Events). Regards, Etienne Samson -- [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
