> I'm wondering if switching to NSRunningApplication could make it more stable
I'm pretty sure no. When I made the recent change to allow → into Activity Monitor.app I think I tried that. Still couldn't get 'hidden' processes (stuff like python or anything running from Terminal would never show up) On 10 Oct 2013, at 18:20, Etienne Samson <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 10 oct. 2013 à 11:09, Patrick Robertson <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> When working on the right arrowing into Activity Monitor business, I noticed >> what Lucas said - currently the way of retrieving processes can be 'flaky'. >> This is partly the fault of Apple: there's no simple way of accessing a list >> of background/daemon/non-UI processes, so we're stuck at the moment. > > Just to point out that it might be our fault (I've rewritten that part, so I > ought to know) ;-). I'm wondering if switching to NSRunningApplication could > make it more stable (right now it's still relying on Carbon Process Events). > > Regards, > Etienne Samson > -- > [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Quicksilver" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
