On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:47 -0600, Archaic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 06:45:54AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > + based on <application>Berkeley DB</application>. This issue only
> > affects
> > + BDB-based repositories on a local installation and does not affect
> > access
> > + to a BDB-based repository on a remote system.</para>
>
> So if I build subversion with bdb-4.4.x and create a repo with a bdb
> fstype, I'm okay as long as I only access it via a remote protocol?
Poorly phrased on my part. Nice catch. I have to indicate somehow it
is okay to access remote installations that weren't built using this
buggy combination of BDB and SVN.
> > + encouraged to dump and reload them into a File System based
> > + repository.</para>
>
> Hyphen inconsistency (BDB-based vs. File System based)
I knew it when I did it. But I preferred what you see above better than
File-System-based, FS-based and worst of all, File System-based.
> > +<screen><userinput>./configure --prefix=/usr \
> > + --with-installbuilddir=/usr/lib/apr-0 &&
>
> Perhaps --without-berkeley-db could be added to avoid the bdb problem
> altogether?
I thought about that also, but I could not figure out what would happen
by not building the BDB library, and then trying to access a BDB-based
repo out in the world somewhere. If you know that it doesn't matter,
without doubt, of course that would be the best scenario.
> > +install -v -m755 -d /usr/share/doc/subversion-&subversion-version;
> > &&
> > cp -v -R doc/* /usr/share/doc/subversion-&subversion-version; &&
> > rm -v
> > /usr/share/doc/subversion-&subversion-version;/{Makefile,doxygen.conf}</userinput></screen>
>
> FWIW, I try to avoid installing anything that has to be immediately
> removed, so I prefer rm -f doc/{Makefile,doxygen.conf} before the cp -R.
It is a no-brainer. Thanks for pointing it out. Also, when I checked,
I noticed my installed docs are all 750 and 640 perms. Apparently, the
entire tree unpacks this way and cp defaults to existing perms. I'm
glad you mentioned the above as it is actually two fixes required.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
12:03:51 up 14 days, 18:38, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.11, 0.16
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
