On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 11:41 -0600, Archaic wrote: > Hrmm. That's a tough one. I can't say I recommend FSFS, unless... Trim > down the note to just be "bdb has problems. Clients don't need it. If > building a server more details can be found at [link to svn server > page]." Then put the more full description of the problem in the server > page where someone should know what FSFS means. That's the best I can > think of.
Seems like a bunch of work all because there is a reference to BDB-based and File System based. And they aren't even in the same sentence, or same paragraph even. :-) -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:43:54 up 14 days, 19:18, 5 users, load average: 0.08, 0.23, 0.25 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
