On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 11:25 -0600, Archaic wrote: > What about FSFS-based?
I thought about this, but I figured FSFS would just draw puzzled looks by the readers. You decide and I'll go whichever way you think is best. > >From INSTALL: > > Berkeley DB is needed to build a Subversion server that supports > the bdb repository filesystem, or to access a bdb repository on > local disk. If you will only use the fsfs repository filesystem, > or if you are building a Subversion client that will only speak > to remote (networked) repositories, you don't need it. > > So basically, if you build a bdb-based repo and want to access it > locally, you already have a bdb-based client (it's the same binary that > created the repo). We warn against building a bdb-based repo, and since > you don't need bdb support to access a remote bdb repo, bdb can be > removed from the equation altogether. I agree. Bruce, you have any problems with using the --dont-use-db switch as Archaic recommends? -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:27:41 up 14 days, 19:02, 5 users, load average: 0.50, 0.15, 0.09 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
