Archaic wrote: >On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:34:27PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > >>In my opinion, the book should represent the proper build order >>more than an alphabetical order. >> >>Thoughts from others? >> >> > >Agreed completely. > > > I don't know if it will help you guys out, but in my own personal LFS builds, I build the biggest majority of BLFS packages, in the best order I can to satisfy dependencies. If you're interested, you can see the order I've put together for my system at:
http://be-linux.org/svn/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/BLFS.xml?rev=3&root=blfs-profile&view=markup That's the order my ALFS profile for BLFS runs in..it's not 100% perfect, and it doesn't include everything, but it'll at least maybe help you guys get a start on things. -J- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
