Richard A Downing wrote:
Should we ask the LFS guys to take that out of their rules, so that we can deal with it in BLFS? This kind of relates to my comment that the explanation for some of this is buried in the LFS book (well the alsa modules stuff anyway).
This is buried in the LFS book for a reason: this kind of modprobe trick for "recommended" dependencies between the modules is not ALSA-specific.
See http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/index.php?pagename=Misc%3A%20UdevHotplugStatus for more information. Everything except Problem 3 is still somewhat-relevant. The summary of Problem 5 should read as "no solution planned".
-- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
