Tushar Teredesai wrote: > Additionally, the way the Recommended dependency is treated on the > lists is different. Basically it is assumed that Recommended == > Required.
I understand that such an assumption was to make support issues easier. However, I have never truly agreed with that. Recommended (if there is one) should mean recommended. And if it is recommended, it should be explained why, ie, 'We the BLFS Team feal that you should use this patch or install this other technically optional program, because...' If a user decides that they don't want it, BLFS should still attempt to offer support. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
