Chris Staub wrote:
Maybe this goes back to having different definitions of "recommended". Just because someone doesn't install something that's "recommended" by the book doesn't mean they should be considered to have "deviated"...at least that's some peoples' (including me) definition of "recommended".
And yes, I know that there is a definition of "Recommended" in the book that mentions it's for a "trouble-free build". But, if you going to go so far as to state that someone who hasn't installed a "Recommended" dependency has "deviated" and shouldn't bother seeking support, then that needs to be stated in the book as well, and any "Recommended" package dependencies should state *why* there are "Recommended".
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
