On Σαβ, Ιαν 13, at 03:38 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > >> 2. http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/patches/all/vim70-langmapmb-4.patch > > > > Yes, I see how this can be useful. But there are other vim patches with > > similar names there, what's the difference? What's the upstream status? > > According to http://www.archivesat.com/VIM_multibyte/thread1827382.htm, Bram > Moolenaar said OK to this patch. So I think it should be added to both LFS > and BLFS. > It's not actually a clear yes.It's a "Yes,but". That is the reason that I was asked for your opinion. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
