Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/01/07 19:17 CST:

>   We need to decide how to do the run time dependencies.

Agreed.


>  I thought we
> agreed to put it into a section after the installation and configuration
> sections, but I may be mistaken.

Well, my remembering was that we decided to add stuff *into* the
configuration section. However, I'm guilty of allowing this to
drift into a paragraph (or note) directly underneath the actual
dependencies (right before the wiki link) as I just felt it was more
appropriate there.

As far as HAL, you picked a strange beast to use as an example. I
can't think of *any* other package that even remotely comes close
to that amount and type of run-time depends.

I'm flexible and willing to go any way we decide. I do like having
them listed underneath the actual dependencies, but in some sort
of descriptive note along with it. It just seems to be more practical
having dependencies grouped somewhat together.

Keep in mind, however, that my message in -book directly reflects
the fact that in the KDE-Base instructions, run-time dependencies
are listed in two different places in the instructions. Whatever
we decide, I'd like to see those condensed together.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
19:29:00 up 22 days, 19:43, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.33, 0.52
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to