Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 02/02/07 12:09 CST: > On Friday 02 February 2007 14:33, TheOldFellow wrote: > >> The third problem is that LFS is almost dead (although BLFS is still >> alive and kicking - It's great to see how much effort you guys are >> putting in, and it's appreciated, I assure you.) and despite Gerard >> having finally built the replacement server, he isn't contributing, and >> there doesn't appear to be much going on. > > Not much going on? 16 bugs were fixed in the space of 30 minutes on > Wednesday!
I think Richard has a good point. And now, after finding out that the LFS Development book hasn't been rendered in almost two months, *and not one person even noticed*, I'm concerned about the health of the LFS project (BLFS seems to still have Editor interest, however). -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 13:14:01 up 25 days, 13:28, 1 user, load average: 0.33, 0.21, 0.11 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
