On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:43:41PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/11/07 15:36 CST:
>
> > Are you guys stripping the libraries? Mine aren't stripped and they're
> > all between 2.8 and 3.0 Mb.
>
> Nope, not stripped. But that wouldn't explain Ken having 225mb
> installed by MesaLib and me having 35. How many .so files are in
> that directory, Dan?
Mine aren't stripped either. Dunno how you get them so small (and
yes, this _is_ an x86 box, before you ask). Ah, I think it's the
old 'ls -l doesn't accurately show the size' problem. For the only
one I'm actually using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $size /usr/lib/X11/modules/dri/unichrome_dri.so
text data bss dec hex filename
2521802 77784 44432 2644018 285832
/usr/lib/X11/modules/dri/unichrome_dri.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $
So, 2.5M code, 77k initialised, 44k automatic variables, and 'ls'
thinks it is 15M (15221019 bytes). On that basis, Randy's figures
might be accurate. My overall measurements use 'df', specifically
USED=`df -k $NUL | grep $ROOTFS | awk '{ print $3 }'`
where $NUL is /dev/null and ROOTFS is the fs I'm building on.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
