On Sun, Feb 11, at 11:33 Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 2/11/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, at 12:52 Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > > > > 8. I'm showing a significant difference in disk space used (The book > > > shows 823MB, my logs show 157MB). Can anyone provide some additional > > > info from their own logs? > > > > > > > Exactly 157. > > I'm seeing 183 including all the tarballs, log, build and installed files. > > > Speaking about disk space sizes,I noticed some differences with mines in > > some > > packages e.g lynx,so I thought I was doing something wrong. > > Just to be sure,you don't count the tarball size into it,right? > > Some of the disk space sizes are certainly out of date, but I thought > we did count the tarball sizes. Randy, Bruce? >
While we are at it,a second question. Why we don't use du instead of df ? du is much more flexible in that regard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
