Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 11/22/07 23:15 CST: > I just don't think that is enough important package to have it in the > book. That's all, nothing else.
Your observation was duly noted. I was simply looking for a foundation and/or reason as to why you felt that way. I was sort of looking for something other than, "Because I don't use it". :-) > So please disregard. My comment is just one person. Let's wait until there's additional community input before we do anything. I didn't mean to stifle the idea, I only commented as that is how I felt and thought the subject worthy of conversation. You've always shown good judgment and have provided useful ideas. Why would I consider "disregarding" anything you have to say? :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 10:08:00 up 10 days, 39 min, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.14, 0.16 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
