Thomas Trepl wrote: > I would like to say that the KDE3 line should be continued as long as > possible/required since KDE4 actually isn't in the state to be a full > replacement of KDE3. KDE4.0 now is not KDE4, some of the KDE gurus said. I > would suggest to upgrade to 3.5.8 and with this, provide a full-featured KDE > desktop and additionally add KDE4 to the book. There is no need to *replace* > KDE3 by KDE4 because you can (but must not) have both KDE versions installed > in parallel (of course in different dirs).
I have always intended to add KDE4 as an additional package to KDE3. At some time in the future, it might be appropriate to drop KDE3, but KDE4 will have a fair bit a maturing to do. > When introducing KDE4 to the BLFS-book you need to add QT4 and cmake etc. > too. > I never understood why QT4 has not managed to be described in the book. > Everyone must have seen that QT4 is (one of) the base of KDE4, so we could > have used the time to the release of KDE4 to become familar with QT4. Now, we > need to have a look on all of those packages at once. The reason I was holding off on Qt4 is because nothing we had used it. I was waiting for KDE4 to add Qt4. Again, I plan on adding Qt4 in addition to and not in place of Qt3. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
